

Legend to the map. Map based on Whattam et al. (2024).
In the field from Grefsenåsen to Ammerud we find rocks from the Permian, preserved in the remnants of the Nittedals cauldron southern end. Calderas are depressions in the bedrock, formed when the rocks above a magma chamber sink as the magma chamber empties. This causes the surface rocks to lie lower than the corresponding surface rocks outside the caldera. Lavas and sediments commonly fill such a depressions in the terrain given the time. As these rocks are lower in the terrain, than the corresponding stratigraphic units outside the calderas, they lay protected from erosion during the subsequent ice ages.
The Nittedals cauldron is one of the least preserved calderas in the Oslo Rift. Oftedahl (1960) reports that the Nittedals cauldron is nearly 80 % destroyed by a process called magmatic stoping. Magmatic stoping is the process where magma intrudes into a rock complex and breaks loose boulders that sink into the magma. This occurred in the Nittedals cauldron about 260-250 Ma ago. At that time, the Nordmarka - Hurdal Syenite Complex intruded into the area. All the Nordmarkites and Grefsen syenites around the remnants of the Alnsjø succession date from this time. The Alnsjø succession itself, which may be a large block that did not melt, underwent contact metamorphism when the magma intruded and possibly during later intrusions. Whattam et al. (2024) report many green minerals such as epidote and chlorite in the rocks that make up the Alnsjø succession, so the degree of metamorphism has probably reached greenschist facies.
The Alnsjø succession itself is, as far as I know, not directly dated. So age estimates for the Alnsjø succession come from comparing the stratigraphy here with other places. For the lavas in the Oslo Rift, the rhomb porphyry lava series are the easiest and most common to correlate. In the Alnsjø succession, only one rhomb porphyry, RP13 "Rectangle porphyry", has been found, in the eastern part of the area. In some older literature, for example Natterstad (1978), this rhomb porphyry was interpreted as the remains of a lava layer, above the basalts that make up the bottom of the succession. Whattam et al. (2024) instead interpret this rhomb porphyry as a magma dike that cuts through the basalts and some of the sediments above the basalts. Whether this RP13 dike is associated with any actual eruptions and thus any outcrops, or even how high up in the succession it went, is unknown. Whatever the case, it would mean that the basalts at the bottom of the strata are older than RP13. Which RP13 series it belongs to is not stated, but to me it looks most like RP13a. RP13c is dated in the Svarten cauldron to be 278 ± 12 Ma (Sundvoll et al., 1990). So the basalt is likely older than that.
Views on the stratigraphic position of Alnsjø successions basal basalts, has changed over time. Holtedahl (1957) suggested that they possibly corresponded with basalt B2, the Holmevann basalt member, in Bærum, that lies above RP9. RP9 is probably mentioned because in Grorud, close to the basalts in the Alnsjø succession or maybe in direct contact with the basalts, a small exposure of rhomb porphyry is found. Directly east-northeast of where the map says “Ammerud”. This rhomb porphyry is mapped as possibly RP9. The rhomb porphyry is metamorphosed and RP9 and RP11 are originally very similar so it is difficult to say for sure what it belongs to. If it is RP9, it would be natural to correlate the basalts with B2 which elsewhere follows RP9. However, this interpretation creates two problems;
1. Why are there no exposures of RP11 and B3 in this area, which elsewhere are much thicker.
2. As thick as the basalts in the Alnsjø successions are, and how many layers there are, they certainly resembles the Steinshøgda basalt member in Bærum cauldron more than anything else. That is an odd coincidence if there is no overlap.
Most "newer" articles such as Oftedahl (1960), Natterstad (1978) and Whattam et al. (2024) therefore correlate the Alnsjø basalts with B3. The rhomb porphyry at Grorud may be the oldest lava in the Alnsjø succession or a xenolith, a block of rock that was broken loose and floated around in the syenitic magma, which accidentally ended up next to the rest of the succession. It may be RP9 or RP11. If we assume that the Alnsjø succession begins with the Alnsjø basalts = B3, knowing that RP11 is 280.2 ± 0.5 Ma (Corfu & Larsen, 2020), then the oldest rocks in the Alnsjø succession are roughly 280-278 Ma.

Rhomb porphyry in Grorud/Ammerud from an exposure in the road Ammerudgrenda, just outside off the map shown in the top image, compared with the sketches of RP9 and RP11 in Larsen (1978) approximately to scale. Mapped as most likely RP9 by, among others, Natterstad (1978) and Graversen et al. (2017).

Plagioclase basalt with a syenite vein, from the basalt near the base of the Alnsjø succession. Presumably what Whattam et al. (2024) call the Kringlefjell basalt K4 in the western part of the area.

An exposure of some layers of aphyric basalt, in what Whattam et al. (2024) call the Breisjøhogdene basalt in the eastern part of the area.
After the basalts were deposited, a change is seen in the type of eruptions and the rocks they formed. The eruptions became more explosive. We first see this in some basaltic tuff breccias. These tuff breccias that lie directly above the basalts are deposits of tuff, ash and other airborne particles from an explosive eruption. These tuff breccias contain pieces of the underlying basalts that broke loose during the eruptions. As time passed, these explosive eruptions became more and more silicic. First a layer of tuff with intermediate composition, approximately similar to the rhomb porphyries in chemistry. Followed by several ignimbrites with rhyolitic [granitic] composition (Whattam et al., 2024). Ignimbrites are deposits from pyroclastic flows, where ash, glass and fragments of pumice with temperatures of 500–700 ℃ have been welded together (Akin et al, 2023). Towards the top of the succession, sedimentary rocks, especially mudstones, dominate. With a final layer of ignimbrite just beneath the conglomerate, that tops the succession (Whattam et al., 2024; Natterstad, 1978).

Part of what Whattam et al. (2024) call the Alnsjø tuff, an andesitic lapilli tuff.

Part of what Whattam et al. (2024) calls the Linderudkollen ignimbrite, a densely welded glassy-ash with many phenocrysts of K-feldspar and sparse small vesicles.

A diabase dike intruding into the lower part of what Whattam et al. (2024) calls the Storhaug Mudstone. Diabase = dark grey, Mudstone = red. On the path between Storhaug and Alnsjøen (59°57′58.81905″ N, 10°50′23.62511″ E).

A close up of what Whattam et al. (2024) calls the Storhaug ignimbrite, an unwelded to moderately welded ignimbrite. “The ignimbrite is variably colored with fresh surfaces typically light pink to greywhite, dotted with green (altered) and brown slightly- to nonvesicular lapilli”(Whattam et al, 2024, p. 9 supplementary material)
The age of the youngest rocks in the Alnsjø succession is even more difficult to say with certainty than the oldest. Both Natterstad (1978) and Whattam et al. (2024) place the conglomerate at Storhaug as the youngest formation in the sequence. Dating sedimentary rocks is difficult. Igneous and some metamorphic rocks can be dated directly by radiometric dating of minerals that contain radioactive elements, such as the mineral zircon that contains uranium. However, this cannot be done for sedimentary rocks, because then you only get the ages of the source rocks. For sedimentary rocks, you need a volcanic layer within the rock or one above and one below that is datable. Another way to estimate the age of a rock is to find index fossils, which allow you to estimate the age, based on ages from another place with the same fossils. However, conglomerates are very poor at preserving fossils, because the coarse rocks often destroy the organic material before it can become a fossil. As these formations are interpreted as having been formed in freshwater, it will be difficult to find index fossils that can be correlated with other locations. If the dry desert landscape that existed at the Carboniferous-Permian transition (Laresen et al., 2008) still persisted in these formations, land plants and animals would also be rare and there might have been little life in the water as well. So fossils are likely not the way to go for the Alnsjø succession.
What we can say for sure about the age of the Storhaug conglomerate is that it must be older than 252 ± 3 Ma, because that is the age of the Nordmarkite (Sundvoll & Larsen, 1990) that penetrated the Alnsjø succession. Presumably, the conglomerate is also older than the Grefsen syenite 255 ± 4 Ma (Sundvoll & Larsen, 1990) that is located around the southern end of the sequence. Directly below the conglomerate is the Storhaug ignimbrite, which is the last volcanic rock in the succession. Dating that ignimbrite will probably give the best estimate of the time span of the succession. Unfortunately, it is not an easy task. Whattam et al. (2024) report that the Storhaug ignimbrite contains both many fragments of older rocks and contains metamorphosed, green, lapilli (stones). Extracting enough minerals that can be reliably dated to when the rock was formed and do not belong to an earlier rock or later metamorphism will be quite a task.

An exposure of the Storhaug conglomerate. Partially covered by moss (green) and lichen (light grey to white). On the path towards Ole Høiland's cave (named after a bank robber from the 1800s).

A close up of Storhaug conglomerate. Just besides the coin, a clast of a aphyric vesicular basalt is visible. The vesicles i partly filed with chlorite and other green minerals. Dark grey to black clast are basalts, redish clasts ar likely ignimbrites.

In the 1880s, the Franco-Belgian mining company “Compagnie Miniere de Grorud” operated copper mines in the area. Linderud mines (This is the northern field (59°58′27.6528″, 10°50′28.9464″)) remain from that time (Pedersen, 2014, p. 81).

The old mining road, “Gamle gruvevei”, built around 1880 to transport raw copper from Linderud Mine down to Alnsjøen. From there, the ore was transported to the east side of Alnsjøen, where the Gotthalfske Copper Works was located. Unfortunately, this cultural heritage road was damaged during logging in 2020 (Langsholt, 2020).

Unknown foundation and basement of a building, (59°58′1.5204″ N, 10°51′36.6408″ E), possibly related to the Gotthalfske Copper Works. Gotthalfske Copper Works operated sporadically between 1704 and 1750, mining 10-ish prospects around Alnsjøen. The largest was perhaps the Rødtvet Mine south of the lake (Pedersen, 2014, pp. 79-80). In the area downside of the dam, slag from the copper works can be found, they appear as black glassy rocks, occasionally with reddish patterns.
Akin, M., Topal, T., Dinçer, İ., Akin, M. K., Özvan, A., Orhan, A., & Orhan, A. (2023) A new quantitative welding degree classification for ignimbrites. Environmental Earth Sciences, 82, Article 345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11026-7
Corfu, F. & Larsen, B.T. (2020). U–Pb systematics in volcanic and plutonic rocks of the Krokskogen area: resolving a 40 million years long evolution in the Oslo rift. Lithos, 376–377(105755), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105755
Langsholt, E. G. (2020, 19. Okt.). Tragisk ødeleggelse av kulturminnet Gamle gruvevei mellom Alunsjøen og Linderud gruver. Lillomarkas venner. https://lillomarkasvenner.no/2020/10/19/tragisk-odeleggelse-av-kulturminnet-gamle-gruvevei-mellom-alunsjoen-og-linderud-gruver/ [In Norwegian]
Larsen, B.T., Olaussen, S., Sundvoll, B. & Heeremans, M. (2008). The Permo-Carboniferous Oslo Rift through six stages and 65 million years. Episodes, 31(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2008/v31i1/008
Pedersen, H. (2014). Kulturminneoversikt i Oslo kommunes skoger i Lillomarka, samt noen nærliggende kulturminner på andre eiendommer. [In Norwegian]
Sundvoll, B. & Larsen, B.T. (1990). Rb-Sr isotope systematics in the magmatic rocks of the Oslo Rift. Norges Geologiske Undersøkelse, Bulletin 418, 27-46. https://static.ngu.no/FileArchive/NGUPublikasjoner/Bulletin418_27-46.pdf
Whattam, J. W., Midtkandal, I., Jerram, D. A., Callegaro, S. & Svensen, H. H. (2024). The episodic onset of explosive and silicic-dominated volcanism in a continental rift; insights from the Permian Oslo Rift, Norway. Volcanica, 7(2), pp. 925–951. doi: https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.07.02.925951.
Copyright © 2025 GeoLektor - All Rights Reserved.